Welcome to
 Teacher ProComp

Unsatisfactory Evaluation

Eligible Educators: All teachers represented by the DCTA agreement

Decision Maker: Principal and trained, independent peer evaluator

Year Implemented: 2006-2007

Purpose

  • Continues current practice of raising salaries only upon demonstrated satisfactory performance
  • Allows teacher to maintain current job while improving to meet the expectation of satisfactory performance
  • Creates a means and time period for due process to be completed without providing automatic increases
  • Gives DPS and DCTA a way to maintain and promote high expectations for teacher performance
  • Reflects good compensation practice in the private and public sector
  • Enables DPS to provide time and support and other resources for teachers to improve their performance

Rationale

  • Satisfactory performance raises should only be awarded for satisfactory performance
  • Unsatisfactory performance must be identified and there should be related compensation consequences
  • Teachers need reinforcement to improve unsatisfactory performance
  • Teachers and principals need time, support and other resources to improve unsatisfactory teacher performance
  • All other increases in the recommended system are earned based on specific performance and should not be withheld

Management Specifications

  • Sound evaluation system that:
    • Emphasizes inter-rater reliability
    • Maintains a fixed cycle of evaluation in years 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 and every third year thereafter and provision for teachers on leave will be made to adjust their evaluation cycle appropriately
    • A fall-to-spring evaluation cycle
    • Well developed rubrics articulating different levels of teacher performance
    • Distinct from disciplinary action
    • Peer evaluation
    • A component for remediation of unsatisfactory performance that includes provisions for a 30-day due process remediation and a one-year development plan for teachers who succeed on the 30-day due process plan
    • A component for peer assistance for unsatisfactory performance
    • Adaptations for student services specialists and other non-classroom assignments
    • The ability to identify a teacher's unsatisfactory performance in "off years" 
    • Self evaluation component
  • A one year plan for professional development with appropriate supports in addition to a 30-day due process remediation plan for teachers with unsatisfactory performance ratings
  • If a teacher receives a rating of unsatisfactory, then a new formal evaluation is required next year
  • The current practice of being able to initiate special evaluations will be continued
  • Teachers who fail to earn a satisfactory rating after appropriate remediation will be subject to probationary non-renewal or dismissal for cause
  • District support for administrators in coordinating resources for teachers on remediation

Economic Specifications

  • Non-probationary teachers receiving an unsatisfactory evaluation will have their 3% satisfactory performance increase delayed until being re-evaluated with a rating of satisfactory or better
  • Probationary teachers receiving an unsatisfactory evaluation will have their annual 1% satisfactory performance increase delayed until being re-evaluated with a rating of satisfactory or better
  • Teachers who are given an unsatisfactory performance rating resulting from a special (out of cycle) evaluation will delay any future 3% salary increase until they earn a satisfactory performance rating

District Capacity That Needs To Be Built

  • A fully developed project plan that includes personnel and other resouces to implement the evaluation system
  • Pilot the use of the evaluation system beginning in the 04-05 school year
  • An evaluation system that has these characteristics:
    • Align peer assistance duties to revised evaluation system
    • Training for teachers and principals on the process of placing teachers on remediation plans
    • Training for teachers and principals to ensure inter-rater reliability
    • Emphasizes professional growth, professional development and continuous improvement
  • Web-based technology for tracking teacher evaluations that is directly connected to payroll